Practical engineering references
Use source-linked guides to choose the right diagram, capture the facts each audience needs, review the result, and keep manufacturing or release claims tied to explicit evidence.
Guides explain what to capture and review; editable project data keeps the result connected to specifications and evidence.
Featured engineering guides
Each guide owns a distinct search and engineering intent. Commercial solution pages explain the product; these references explain the work.
Choose between system context, container, component, code, dynamic, landscape, and deployment views without mixing abstraction levels.
Separate fabrication, assembly, and editable-source packages, then verify Gerbers, drills, stackup, BOM, placement, test, and release evidence.
Follow task-level instructions for diagrams, linked specifications, architecture checks, electronics, harnesses, collaboration, import, export, and release.
Software architecture
Architecture diagrams work when scope, abstraction, responsibilities, technology, and relationships are explicit. Start with context, zoom only where added detail changes a decision, and keep rationale linked to the elements it governs.
Electronics and production
Production work needs exact identities, controlled dimensions, current checks, independently inspected outputs, supplier evidence, test criteria, and approval bound to one named revision.
Record parts, interfaces, constraints, dimensions, variants, sources, and unresolved assumptions without inventing missing data.
Derive drawings, tables, CAM, BOM, placement, formboard, or release documents from the current project revision.
Reopen exported files, reconcile quantities and geometry, and complete the selected supplier's DFM or process review.
Resolve blocking findings, preserve manifests and fingerprints, and attach named approval to the exact bytes handed off.
About the guides
The guides turn recurring engineering questions into reviewable workflows. They do not replace requirements, primary evidence, analysis, testing, or authorized approval.
Struct engineering guides are practical, source-linked references for creating, reviewing, and handing off software, electronics, mechanical, robotics, and multidisciplinary engineering work.
No. The guides explain workflows, checks, and evidence boundaries. Engineers and authorized reviewers remain responsible for requirements, source data, technical analysis, supplier review, testing, and release approval.
Yes. The conceptual checklists are tool-independent. Product-specific sections identify how Struct supports the workflow and state where external tools, authoritative sources, or human approval are still required.