Robotics engineering solution

See the complete robot.From software to motion.

Connect functional architecture and detailed wiring across power, independent safety, deterministic control, perception, feedback, communication, and mechanics—without erasing the boundaries between disciplines.

  • 24 robotics symbols
  • CAN FD + EtherCAT
  • ROS 2 relationships
  • Completeness checks
AURELIA-R1 · complete robotSource-rendered project
Editable AURELIA-R1 robot architecture connecting operator, compute, perception, safety, fieldbus, drives, and physical assemblies

Rendered from the checked-in AURELIA-R1 system project used by the application.

PerceptionLiDAR + camerasTime-synced sensing
ComputeAutonomy stackROS 2 · planning
SafetyIndependent controlE-stop · STO
MotionDrives + feedbackEtherCAT · encoders
@
Hazard linkedProtective stop path

Full-stack robotics clarity

Connect behavior, embedded control, safety, and mechanics.

Give every robotics specialist a disciplined view of the work while keeping interfaces and system decisions visible across the complete machine.

Model the functional stack

Map perception, localization, planning, operator control, compute, networks, real-time control, and feedback with explicit ownership.

  • Platforms, sensors, compute, and nodes
  • ROS 2 topics and software flows
  • Coordinate frames and interfaces
ϟ

Trace detailed robot wiring

Separate protected power, independent safety, deterministic buses, drives, encoders, and device connections from the functional view.

  • Supplies, protection, and references
  • CAN FD and EtherCAT relationships
  • Harness and device metadata
@

Keep safety intent explicit

Link hazards, safety functions, interface controls, timing assumptions, and test evidence to the precise path they govern.

  • Independent safety modeling
  • Robot completeness checks
  • Bidirectional specification links

Robotics work in Struct

Keep autonomy, safety, power, wiring, and mechanics connected.

Model functional behavior and physical implementation as focused views that share interfaces, part evidence, specifications, and review state.

  • 0124 robotics symbolsPlatforms, sensors, compute, autonomy, safety, control, drives, feedback, and physical outcomes.
  • 02CAN FD, EtherCAT, and ROS 2Named connector semantics distinguish deterministic buses, device networks, and software relationships.
  • 03Separate critical pathsKeep independent safety, protected power, control, perception, and harness detail explicit.
  • 04Part evidence and quantitiesUse exact-MPN lookup, aggregate required quantities, compare project inventory, and prepare Harness outputs.

Integrate the machine

Design each layer, then review the complete behavior.

Move between architecture and wiring detail while preserving interface identity, safety boundaries, and cross-discipline rationale.

01

Frame robot behavior

Define the platform, environment, operator, autonomy, safety, and physical outcomes.

02

Map power, control, and communication

Connect supplies, compute, safety, fieldbuses, sensors, drives, actuators, and feedback.

03

Attach requirements and evidence

Link interface specifications, hazards, timing, calibration, test plans, and design rationale.

04

Review across every discipline

Bring software, electrical, controls, mechanical, systems, safety, and manufacturing into one record.